<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 21st Century Digital Boy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurobashing.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurobashing.com</link>
	<description>Hacker Musings and OCD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So why don&#8217;t we replace AppleScript? by Gregg</title>
		<link>http://neurobashing.com/2012/02/05/so-why-dont-we-replace-applescript/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://21cdb.wordpress.com/?p=1301#comment-143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, much of this is academic at this point because it looks like the Sandbox implementation will effectively kill the notion of open scripting of applications on the Mac. 

If I had to guess, they&#039;re going to kill open scripting interfaces entirely in favor of some sort of Automator thingee: instead of publishing an AppleScript dictionary for your app, you&#039;d publish Automator actions. One assumes Apple has either decided regular people don&#039;t script things or scripting applications is a gateway drug to security hell, and with rising marketshare they can&#039;t afford the risk.

The other alternative is they&#039;re going to simply replace the OSA entirely, and they haven&#039;t let on how that&#039;s going to work; but they&#039;ve decided pulling the bandaid off is the best solution, hence the rather sudden &quot;no more scripting if you want to sell through the App Store&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, much of this is academic at this point because it looks like the Sandbox implementation will effectively kill the notion of open scripting of applications on the Mac. </p>
<p>If I had to guess, they&#8217;re going to kill open scripting interfaces entirely in favor of some sort of Automator thingee: instead of publishing an AppleScript dictionary for your app, you&#8217;d publish Automator actions. One assumes Apple has either decided regular people don&#8217;t script things or scripting applications is a gateway drug to security hell, and with rising marketshare they can&#8217;t afford the risk.</p>
<p>The other alternative is they&#8217;re going to simply replace the OSA entirely, and they haven&#8217;t let on how that&#8217;s going to work; but they&#8217;ve decided pulling the bandaid off is the best solution, hence the rather sudden &#8220;no more scripting if you want to sell through the App Store&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So why don&#8217;t we replace AppleScript? by macgrunt</title>
		<link>http://neurobashing.com/2012/02/05/so-why-dont-we-replace-applescript/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macgrunt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://21cdb.wordpress.com/?p=1301#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a big fan of Applescript for a few years now. Yes, Applescript is not &#039;proper&#039; scripting. Yes, there are heaps of things you cannot do with Applescript. Yes, Applescript can be bloody frustrating. But for someone like me — with no programming background — Applescript has been brilliant. I have saved myself, and others, LITERALLY hundreds of hours of tedious, repetitive work in a publishing environment thanks to Applescript. This is only because the software I use has an excellent Applescript dictionary and lots of online resources — but without Applescript, I would have split my skull open long ago through shear banging-against-brick-wall angst. 

m.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a big fan of Applescript for a few years now. Yes, Applescript is not &#8216;proper&#8217; scripting. Yes, there are heaps of things you cannot do with Applescript. Yes, Applescript can be bloody frustrating. But for someone like me — with no programming background — Applescript has been brilliant. I have saved myself, and others, LITERALLY hundreds of hours of tedious, repetitive work in a publishing environment thanks to Applescript. This is only because the software I use has an excellent Applescript dictionary and lots of online resources — but without Applescript, I would have split my skull open long ago through shear banging-against-brick-wall angst. </p>
<p>m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

